无敌僵尸王

球员引力榜格林第四！为何仍说他是火箭G1溃败罪魁？_我的网站

A |     

    A worker fulfills orders for energy-saving and environmentally friendly boilers destined for export in a manufacturing enterprise in Nantong, East China's Jiangsu Province on August 4, 2026. The enterprise offers products including industrial waste disposal equipment, with sales to more than 30 countries and regions. Photo: CNS PhotoIn recent years, some economies, anxious about their own industrial competitiveness and market position, have politicized economic and trade issues, taking turns to hype false narratives such as "China overcapacity" and a "China Shock 2.0," and using them as pretexts to roll out protectionist measures.
But what are the facts on the ground?
China's Ministry of Commerce recently released a document titled China's Position on the So-Called Excess Capacity Issue. Reviewing the evolution of the global capacity landscape from a historical perspective, it offers an objective analysis of how industrial subsidies, trade surpluses, economic imbalances and market competition relate to "overcapacity," sets out China's policy practices and the direction of its efforts, and puts forward China's ideas and proposals - a forceful response to the "China overcapacity" narrative. 
Plainly, the argument that "China's inadequate domestic demand gives rise to excess capacity" rests on a logical sleight of hand - it takes a localized phenomenon at the micro level of the market and applies it wholesale to the structure of the macroeconomy, a picture far removed from reality.
China is not only a major manufacturing power but also a major consuming power. Domestic demand has long been the main engine of the Chinese economy.
To see through the logical fallacy of the "overcapacity" narrative, one must first be clear about where the Chinese economy actually sits in the global landscape.
In the course of economic globalization, China has actively integrated itself into the international division of industrial labor and become the "world's factory" in the truest sense. Chinese manufacturing has enriched the global supply of goods, lowered living costs for consumers in countries around the world, and played an important part in easing global inflationary pressure. But to define China simply as a "producer" on that basis, and from there to conclude that it suffers from "inadequate domestic demand and overcapacity," is a proposition that does not hold water.
From 2013 to 2024, domestic demand contributed an average of 93 percent to China's economic growth, with consumption and investment accounting for an average of 55 percent and 38 percent respectively. China's total retail sales of consumer goods rose from 23.8 trillion yuan ($3.53 trillion) in 2013 to 50.1 trillion yuan in 2025, doubling in size.
Measured at the World Bank's purchasing power parity rates, China's total retail sales of consumer goods in 2025 were 1.7 times those of the US, making the country the world's largest market for consumer goods in all but name. China today ranks first globally in the physical volume of goods consumed, and its per capita annual consumption of some industrial products already approaches the levels seen in developed economies.
China keeps expanding its domestic demand and is working toward a higher-level balance between supply and demand.
Growth in China's total retail sales of consumer goods has slowed somewhat in recent years, and some have taken this as proof of weak domestic demand. That reading is neither objective nor complete.
A strong domestic market provides strategic support for Chinese modernization. The outline of China's 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-30) period devotes a dedicated part to building such a market, stressing the need to adhere to the strategic focus of expanding domestic demand, to expand effective investment, to further implement special actions to boost consumption, to promote the expansion and upgrading of commodity consumption, to unleashing the potential of service consumption, to strengthening the foundation of residents' consumption and to continuously improve the consumption environment - using new demand to guide new supply, and using new supply to create new demand, so as to promote a virtuous cycle between consumption and investment, and between supply and demand, achieve a higher level of dynamic balance between supply and demand.
The slowdown in retail sales growth is consistent with China's shift from high-speed growth to high-quality development, and it also reflects the upgrading of the country's consumption structure. China's consumer market is moving faster from one dominated by goods toward one in which goods and services carry equal weight. Spending on services is growing rapidly and is expected to account for more than half of the total by 2030.
China's super-sized market is not only the bedrock of its own development but also a broad platform on which countries around the world can share in the dividends of that growth.
China has ranked as the world's second-largest importer for 17 consecutive years and is a major export destination for nearly 80 countries and regions. It has granted zero-tariff treatment to 63 countries and regions, becoming the first major economy in the world to extend full zero-tariff coverage to every African country and every least developed country that has diplomatic relations with it. It is also the only country to host an international import expo, having staged eight editions of the China International Import Expo with cumulative intended deals worth more than $580 billion. Over the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-25) period, China's cumulative imports topped 90 trillion yuan. These facts and figures show clearly that China is not just the "world's factory" but, still more, the "world's market."
Looking ahead, China's middle-income group is set to exceed 800 million people within little more than a decade, and per capita GDP is expected to reach the level of a moderately developed country. With vast room for consumption and ample potential and vitality, domestic demand will remain the main engine of China's economic development and will keep injecting strong momentum into world economic growth.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 6, 2026.
。    杰伦-格林成功地让勇士取得了23分的领先，当火箭猛男们奋起直追将分差缩小到3分，又是杰伦-格林，扮演了勇士救星的角色。有意思的是，美国高阶数据网站bball的统计显示，杰伦格林在本赛季的引力排行榜上高居第4，这本是一件让火箭球迷欣慰的事情，但看过榜单之后你会发现，其中一定藏有猫腻。

B | 无论如何，我们也不该把格林的名字，和库里、东契奇们放在一起相提并论吧。关于引力值的解释，我们从有球引力开始，这项数据是衡量一支球队对对方的持球手投入了多少防守注意力和防守资源，一般来说，有球引力高的球员往往遭遇夹击的次数更多。

如此这般，就不难理解，为什么格林在持球时会有这么强的引力了。如图所示，在总出场时间至少达到2500分钟的27名球员里，格林的相对真实命中率排名倒数第2，有效和失误传球比排名第21。

C | 加上火箭是本赛季三分最差的球队之一，不夹击你，夹击谁呢。回到火勇G1，第二节中段当格林回到场上，火箭只落后6分，然后格林先在点名库里之后，没有选择强攻而是后撤步三分，打铁。

D | 好不容易完成一次抢断，却在转换进攻中吃到进攻犯规。接着是强突之后的攻框未果，再来一个高难度中投不进，而他的右边，是已经被完全放空的小史密斯。

E | 当然了，格林的无球确实还不错，本赛季的空位接球投三分命中率高达41.6%，但你马上就是年薪3000万的球员了，你至少得成为一名优秀的3D，才配得上你的薪水吧。可我们的格林，没有D。

F | 说实话，乌度卡已经够照顾格林了，本赛季格林主防对方明星球员的回合占比只有7.37%，仅高于联盟37%的球员，他在防守端面对的，大多数时候都是没什么球权的球员。

就像火勇G1，大多数时候他面对的是勇士的7号得分手穆迪，但他依然贡献了像这样的名场面：夹击被逼到三分线外的巴特勒，漏掉空切的波杰，请问你就这么瞧不起波杰么。

第四节最后时刻，范弗利特铁树开花将分差缩小到4分后，又是格林，在已方已在强侧囤积重兵的情况下，又放掉了波杰，导致后者顺下引来申京，穆迪底角空位三分命中。这一球，彻底杀死了火箭，也将格林的季后赛处子秀，扔进了垃圾桶。    

。

G |

Current article:http://aw9sx.zeitujiangshaopen.pics/vj9db/kb58.html

Published on:20:18:14